CSSP SIPO-CONSECUTIVELY SETTLED SOVEREIGN PEOPLIES SUPRANATIONAL INTERNATIONAL PROJECTS ORGANIZATIONS-OPIS CSSP

IDLE NO MORE ULALI

CAVEAT      FORWARD THINKING STATEMENT     CAVEAT

OCT 31ST     SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST     2020 A.D.E.

Preliminary Information Submission

Question : Does Mi'kmaq Peoples Sovereignty Preclude The 1752 Trade Treaty With The English Crown : Question

Subset

Does The 1697 Expiry Of The Hudson's Bay Company Charter & Its Original Real Estate Acquisition Prohibition Render The 1867 BNA Act Moot

Subset






SUMMARY : IS THERE A CROWN CANADA WITH JURISDICTION TO REGULATE THE MI'KMAQ PEOPLES TODAY ? : QUESTION

PLEASE, REVIEW THE SUBSTANCE ISSUES RAISED IN THIS FRIENDLY BLOG POSTING FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE - REFERENCES SEEK TO RAISE INTO DELIBERATIVE DECISION-MAKING ON THE CURRENT MATTERS OF PARAMOUNTCY IN GOVERNING MATTER OF TRADITIONAL ANCESTRAL LANDS THROUGH REFERENCE TO OTHER POLITICALLY RELATED ISSUES :
  1. IS THE CANADA 1867 - 1982 CHARTER VOID SINCE 1697 ?
  2. HAS CANADA'S SUPREME COURT DECIDED THAT CANADA REVENUE AGENCY HAS NO JURISDICTION IN MI'KMAQ INVESTMENT MATTERS ?
  3. HAS THE 2009 HTG vs CANADA AT IACHR ESTABLISHED THAT CSSP (CONSECUTIVELY SETTLED SOVEREIGN PEOPLES) OF TURTLE ISLAND NORTH ARE ENTITLED TO SUBMIT LAND TITLES COMPLAINTS TO INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS WITHOUT FIRST EXHAUSTING THE "INTERNAL" CANADA COURT SYSTEM?
  4. HAS THE UN 1947 RIGHT TO RETURN TO ANCESTRAL LANDS DECLARATION PROVIDED PRECEDENCE FOR 2020 MI'KMAQ RIGHT TO GOVERN AS THE PARAMOUNT ENTITLED POLITICAL ACTOR BY BOTH CUSTOM LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ?
  5. DID THE 1923 CHIEF DESKAHEH Of HAUDENOSAUNEE ESTABLISH PRECEDENCE FOR MI'KMAQ RIGHT TO BE RECOGNIZED IN A SIMILAR MANNER AS THE 1613 - 2020 INTERNATIONAL NATION-TO-NATION TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HAUDENOSAUNEE AND THE EMPIRE OF THE NETHERLANDS?
REVERSE ONUS : BY CUSTOM AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF CIVIL, POLITICAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS DECLARATIONS AND CONVENTIONS, DO MI'KMAQ PEOPLES POSSESS GROUNDS TO PURSUE PROTECTION FROM CROWN CANADA THROUGH THE UN CHARTER PROVISIONS ARISING UNDER CHAPTER VII : PROHIBITION OF ALIEN HOSTILE MILITARY OCCUPATION IN ABSENCE OF A SPECIFIC WARRANT FROM THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL ? AND, WHERE SUCH ALIEN OCCUPANCY OCCURS, ARE THE MI'KMAQ PEOPLES ENTITLED TO REQUIRE THE UNSC TO SUPPORT A MI'KMAQ COMPLAINT TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - REQUESTING THAT THE PROSECUTOR ISSUE AN ARREST WARRANT UPON THE MECHANISM PROVISIONS ? 

Respectfully Submitted By
RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN : SQYX : EMISSARY : IAI
cc : DR STITUMAATULWUT HWUNEEM - KWA'MUTSUN
Voir Dire
ADDENDUM VOIR DIRE : Would Elizabeth II Be The Principal Respondent In The Event That Mi'kmaq Peoples Submit A Land Title Complaint To International Tribunals? Would Such Tribunals Absolve A Claim Of Absolute Immunity From Prosecution ? Would The Elizabeth II Crown Assets Be Subject Of Any Civil Remedies In A Mi'kmaq Claim ? NOTING THAT The Published Review Of The Elizabeth II Real Estate Assets Are Composed Of 1 / 6 (One Sixth) Of The World's Governed Territories IN TOTO. And, In Canada, Federal Estimates Currently Assess The Settlement Of Indigenous Land Claims Will Exceed $200-Billion - Not Including The MACRO ISSUE Of The Undetermined Total Settlement Of The Indian Trust Fund.

Before June, 2021, When Elizabeth II Resigns The Crown, Canada Must Prepare The Ascension Documents To Induct The Prince Of Wales As The Canadian Monarch - As Do All Of The Global Territories Of The Prevailing Elizabeth II Majestic Dominion Through The Commonwealth Of Nations. Therefore, A Mi'kmaq Claim Upon Elizabeth II Would Likely Include The Joint And Several Notation Of  "All Heirs And Successors".
Authorized Disclosure By : HRH DR STITUMAATULWUT HWUNEEM, LLB : Turtle Island North SIPO
Respectfully Published By : RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN : SIPO Ambassador - at - Large XXII
Private      1 250 709 1809      Direct

INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS AND ORGANIZATIONS : GDP BY COUNTRY : CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX
WITHOUT PREJUDICE : NOT LEGAL ADVICE; NOR, A DIRECTIVE TO LEGAL COUNSEL. POLITICAL COMMENTARIES ONLY : ERRORS AND OMISSIONS EXCEPTED



WITHOUT PREJUDICE : Not Legal Advice; Nor, A Directive To Legal Counsel. Political Commentaries Only : ERRORS & OMISSIONS EXCEPTED



OCT 31ST     SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST     2020 A.D.E.
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)